Shotgun Marketing Blog
Posts Tagged ad agencies
do as they say not as they do
Posted by Chris Houchens in advertising, online on June 30, 2009
Q. — As a general rule, what industry (as a whole) has the worst web sites?
A. — Ad Agencies.
I’ve noticed most agency web sites have a few common characteristics:
- Rule #1: Flash!
- Staff / Management Bios: Wacky, fun, and meaningless. There is a über-creative photo of the person pretending to have fun.
- Site Navigation: Not at the top, bottom, left, or right. In order to click around to the other pages on the site, you’ll need to take a bus to another location.
- Contact Info: Phone numbers, emails, etc hidden on the most illogical page possible.
- Office Pictures: Two ways to go here. 1) If it’s an “agency” of one guy with a Mac in his bedroom, then you’ll see some creative use of stock photography. 2) If it’s a real “agency”, the wackiness continues with pics of the foosball table, the aquarium, and the video game area to show potential clients how their billable hours are being wasted while creativity happens.
- Philosophy: Starts off with “We’re a new type of agency.” and the rest is filled with meaningless jargon and buzzwords.
- I don’t think we can say it enough: Flash!
- Portfolio: Just a few logos. Maybe a shot of an ad. The ROI is never mentioned. This link is always called “the work”
- Blogs: All staff members seem to take turns “writing posts” by copying / summarizing chapters out of the advertising textbooks they couldn’t sell back to their college bookstore.
- Content: It seems everyone shot down everyone else’s ideas until there was no content left
- Timeliness: Site is never updated. (except for every few years when the whole thing is torn down and replaced with something similar.) Rinse. Repeat.
I’m sure I’ve missed a few. Your thoughts?
ad agencies, bestof2009, crispin porter + bogusky, web sites
best creative clip I’ve ever seen on YouTube
Posted by Chris Houchens in advertising on July 27, 2008
You see, it’s funny because it’s true. I’ve never designed a stop sign, but I have been in discussions that were frighteningly like these.
cyprus snail spam
Posted by Chris Houchens in online on June 18, 2008
I’ve been getting alot of pitches lately in the inbox. (You know, because I’m such an A-lister.) But while the spinmeisters sending the email are working hard to find marketing/business blogs, they’re not putting much effort into the actual pitches. Instead of the stale monotony of a data merge form email, it’s typically the stale monotony of a perky intern trying to garner my goodwill.
Most of the time, you can tell they’ve never visited the blog because they’ve gotten some basic obvious fact about me or the blog wrong — or because the product they’re pitching is not even related to the topics I normally cover. But, of course, most pr and ad agencies make money on efforts not results. Some agency or marketing firm has blown smoke up some client’s oriface by ensuring that they can get blog coverage of thier product, book, etc so they just spam every blogger hoping to strike one eventually. (look! we can work the social media web2.0 buzzword train!)
I’m used to it in the email inbox, but not my postal one. Imagine my surprise today when
I open my spider-infested mailbox and I have a letter from Cyprus, the small eastern Mediterranean island country where they like to center-justify their address fields.
The letter inside is a pitch for some dvd training system for speakers and lost me after about the first paragraph. But I opened it and looked at it (which is an essential step in any direct marketing campaign).
I suggest all these PR agencies trying to get blog coverage start doing this. Instead of setting up a bunch of interns in a cubicle farm and spamming bloggers, why not send them all to an island nation (Malta, Cuba, Trinidad and Tobago) and have them send us postal pitches?
It might work.
(and btw — I am always looking for something to write/blog about. If you have a relevant well thought out pitch and want to reach my millions billions of engaged readers who are all innovators and early adopters, send it along. And seriously, if you’re one of the readers who wants me to take on a topic, please email me. I’m starting to get blogger’s block.)
ad agencies, direct mail, email marketing, public relations, spam
look at me!!!
Posted by Chris Houchens in advertising, marketing, strategy on March 6, 2008
So Firebrand failed. That’s amazing. Hard to believe that people don’t want to watch a show or web channel that has nothing but ads.
In several of my marketing talks, I make the implicit point that no one cares about your marketing except you. And the only people who actually look for ads are the people paying for them and the people who sell them.
But for some reason, many companies feel that their advertising is an entertainment source. Visit a company’s web site and see a big flashy-blinky that says “Click to view our latest TV commercial!” Companies upload their spot to the Google Tubes and think they’re offering substance. Of course, you know the idea du jour. Stagger in like a greasy used care salesman in a blog, try to be my “friend” on Facebook, or crash some other private party.
Sure, people are interested in advertising and become ad experts around the time of the “big game”. But for the most part, people try to avoid “advertising”. What people want is answers to their problems. And sometimes advertising shows them an answer. But most advertising I see is undirected and loud — and not really concerned about connecting with the right people.
Stop advertising and start providing answers to your customers’ problems. And you might have to do that through a print ad or a TV spot. Just remember that people are concerned about the message — not the messenger.
Fewer Unpopped Kernels
Posted by Chris Houchens in advertising on January 17, 2007
You’re an agency and you’ve just landed the Orville Redenbacher popcorn account. During the brainstorm session, someone says “Let’s have Orville Redenbacher in the spots!” Don’t let the fact that he died 11 years ago stop you.
CP+B apparently aren’t content with just having the Burger King creep you out while watching the teevee. Now they’ve re-animated Orville Redenbacher.
Yes. Re-animated. They’re using “cutting edge technology” to stick him in the spots. Apparently, it’s the same technology Andrew McCarthy used in “Weekend at Bernies”
There’s a backlash…and here…and here…and here…and basically all over.
Using a “real” person as the core of your brand will eventually hurt you….because while the company may live forever…people don’t.
The company that has pulled off a “re-animation” is Kentucky Fried Chicken. While John Y Brown milked The Colonel for all he was worth while he was alive…Pepsico, Tricon, Yum!, etc really used him up. The cartoon-hipster-Randy-Quaidish Colonel image is nothing like Harland.
And that’s eventually what will happen to Orville Redenbacher…and Dave Thomas….and Dr. Z…oh…wait.
Connect on Facebook
Blogroll
- Adages
- AdBroad
- AdFreak
- AdRants
- Bad Banana
- Biz with Ameerah
- Brand Autopsy
- Buzzmachine
- ChangeThis
- Church of the Customer
- Copyblogger
- Copyranter
- Customers Rock
- Duct Tape Marketing
- ExitCreative
- Google Small Biz Blog
- Hear2.0
- HorsePigCow
- IdeasOnIdeas
- Jaffe Juice
- Lil Miss Jen
- Logic + Emotion
- Make the Logo Bigger
- Malcolm Gladwell
- Maximum Customer Experience
- Micropersuasion
- NYTimes Media & Advertising
- Pedestrian Typography
- Reveries
- Ries’ Pieces
- SAMBA
- Seth Godin
- Slate’s Ad Report Card
- TechnoMarketer
- Toad Stool
- Tom Peters
- Twist Image
- Viral Garden
- Web Ink Now
- Where’s My Jetpack?
Archives
- August 2010 (1)
- July 2010 (3)
- June 2010 (3)
- May 2010 (3)
- April 2010 (1)
- March 2010 (8)
- February 2010 (2)
- January 2010 (4)
- December 2009 (4)
- November 2009 (2)
- October 2009 (1)
- September 2009 (2)
- July 2009 (2)
- June 2009 (5)
- May 2009 (8)
- April 2009 (4)
- March 2009 (7)
- February 2009 (9)
- January 2009 (5)
- December 2008 (4)
- November 2008 (5)
- October 2008 (5)
- September 2008 (10)
- August 2008 (3)
- July 2008 (5)
- June 2008 (8)
- May 2008 (4)
- April 2008 (4)
- March 2008 (6)
- February 2008 (9)
- January 2008 (7)
- December 2007 (6)
- November 2007 (11)
- October 2007 (9)
- September 2007 (5)
- August 2007 (14)
- July 2007 (7)
- June 2007 (7)
- May 2007 (8)
- April 2007 (7)
- March 2007 (8)
- February 2007 (7)
- January 2007 (8)
- December 2006 (7)
- November 2006 (9)
- October 2006 (5)
- September 2006 (11)
- August 2006 (10)
- July 2006 (8)
- June 2006 (11)
- May 2006 (8)
- April 2006 (14)
- March 2006 (15)
- February 2006 (9)
- January 2006 (11)
- December 2005 (9)
- November 2005 (10)
- October 2005 (14)
- September 2005 (8)
- August 2005 (11)
- July 2005 (6)
- June 2005 (4)
- May 2005 (6)
- April 2005 (1)
- March 2005 (8)
- February 2005 (11)
- January 2005 (7)
Disclaimer
Everything posted on this blog is the personal opinion of Chris Houchens and does not necessarily represent the views of his employers, his clients, or anyone else.Twitter posts
- For the @JeffFowle followers looking for Brand Zeitgeist -- you can find it on Amazon here: http://bit.ly/avwgpm
- WOW! Humbled. Thank you. >>>> RT @JeffFowle IMHO @RayLinDairy 'brandzeitgeist' by @shotgunconcepts is right up there with @thebook by @Dom
- @lilmissjen Insert "I just became Mayor of Syphyllis" joke here
- Look to see who known Influencers are following on Twitter. You'll find the influencers of the influencers. Q4 #pr20chat
- SMR is better when trying to influence SEO. Q3 #pr20chat
- Via @timgrable / Grable Group: author of new business book, Brand Zeitgeist as marketing speaker for your event http://tinyurl.com/24236kh
- RT @yaysarcasm: I can only imagine what Jack Kevorkian was thinking during the In Memoriam montage #emmys


